I can't imagine what the drool-cases in the New York Times newsroom are hoping to find in these records. What could they possibly find that would be germane to Judge Roberts's confirmation hearing? I hope they are shut down, and shut down hard for it.
Do you get the New York Times? Are you disgusted yet? You can contact them here.
UPDATE (2005-08-05-0945 EDT): From Power Line:
Sources familiar with the matter told FOX News that at least one lawyer turned the Times down flat, saying that any effort to pry into adoption case records, which are always sealed, would be reprehensible.The New York Times is now forced to fumble through a dictionary to look up the meaning of "reprehensible".
No comments:
Post a Comment