Thursday, July 07, 2005


The best comment I've read so far with respect to this morning's attack on London has been on Rantburg:
What makes al Q think they can achieve with a handful of suicidal primitives what the combined strength of the Luftwaffe failed to do sixty five years ago? Morons.
You said it, Bulldog.

Michelle Malkin's got a number of posts up already.

The "Nuke Mecca Now" crowd is warming up, too. That's an option I think needs to be saved for later. Air strikes on Damascus... that has some appeal.

UPDATE: The Corner passes on an email from another Londoner sitting in his office: "Is this the best they can do?"

UPDATE II: Hugh Hewitt has posted a series of links with chronology, as well as an excerpt from Belmont Club.

UPDATE III: Does this make Chuck Schumer's comment about "going to war" over a Supreme Court nomination sound... small?

UPDATE IV: Irish Pennants weighs in with a brief tribute to England.

UPDATE V: CAIR has come up with a statement.

"We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender...
-- Winston Churchill (Hear it at the BBC History Site -- requires Real Player)

That's the spirit of Britain that we all hope comes to fore now that violent jihad has come to the heart of London. God save the Queen.

Update VII: (via Hugh) Mark Steyn's piece on the choice before the UK, as it was before Spain.

No comments: